Browsing by Author "Katabira, Elly"

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Antiretroviral Drugs for Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV: A Review of Potential Effects on HIV-Exposed but Uninfected Children
    (2011) Heidari, Shirin; Mofenson, Lynne; Cotton, Mark F.; Marlink, Richard; Cahn, Pedro; Katabira, Elly
    Objective Antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) can prevent HIV mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), but in utero ARV exposure may be associated with neurologic symptoms due to mitochondrial toxicity (MT). We sought to identify the currently recommended PMTCT regimen that optimally balances risks of pediatric HIV infection and neurologic MT. Design Published MTCT and MT data were used in a decision analytic model of MTCT among women in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods We investigated the HIV and MT risks associated with no ARV prophylaxis and five recommended regimens ranging from single-dose nevirapine to 3-drug ART. Sensitivity analyses varied all parameters, including infant feeding strategy and the disability of MT relative to HIV. Results Provision of no ARVs is the least effective and least toxic strategy, with 18-month HIV risk of 30.4% and MT risk of 0.2% (breastfed infants). With increasing drug number and duration, HIV risk decreases markedly (to 4.9% with 3-drug ART), but MT risk also increases (to 2.2%, also with 3-drug ART). Despite increased toxicity, 3-drug ART minimizes total adverse pediatric outcomes (HIV plus MT), unless the highest published risks are true for both HIV and MT, or the disability from MT exceeds 6.4 times that of HIV infection. Conclusions The risk of pediatric MT from effective PMTCT regimens is at least an order of magnitude lower than the risk of HIV infection associated with less effective regimens. Concern regarding MT should not currently limit the use of 3-drug ART for PMTCT where it is available.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Asking the right questions: developing evidence-based strategies for treating HIV in women and children
    (2011) Karim, Quarraisha A.; Banegura, Antoine; Cahn, Pedro; Christie, Charmagne D.; Dintruff, Robin; Distel, Michael; Hankins, Catherine; Hellmann, Nicholas; Katabira, Elly; Lehrman, Sandra; Montaner, Julio; Purdon, Scott; Rooney, James F.; Woof, Robin; Heidari, Shirin
    In July 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued formal revisions of its guidelines on the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV. The new guidelines greatly expand eligibility for treatment of adults and children, as well as for pregnant women seeking prophylaxis for vertical HIV transmission. WHO's new recommendations bring the guidelines closer to practices in developed countries, and its shift to earlier treatment alone will increase the number of treatment-eligible people by 50% or more. Scaling up access to HIV treatment is revealing important gaps in our understanding of how best to provide for all those in need. This knowledge gap is especially significant in developing countries, where women and children comprise a majority of those living with HIV infection. Given the magnitude and significance of these populations, the International AIDS Society, through its Industry Liaison Forum, prioritized HIV treatment and prophylaxis of women and children. In March 2010, the International AIDS Society and 15 partners launched a Consensus Statement outlining priority areas in which a relative lack of knowledge impedes delivery of optimal prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) and treatment to women and children. The Consensus Statement, "Asking the Right Questions: Advancing an HIV Research Agenda for Women and Children", makes a special appeal for a more gender-sensitive approach to HIV research at all stages, from conception to design and implementation. It particularly emphasizes research to enhance the understanding of sex-based differences and paediatric needs in treatment uptake and response. In addition to clinical issues, the statement focuses on programmatic research that facilitates access and adherence to antiretroviral regimens. Better coordination of HIV management with sexual and reproductive healthcare delivery is one such approach. We discuss here our knowledge gaps concerning effective, safe PMTCT and treatment for women and children in light of the expansion envisioned by WHO's revised guidelines. The guideline's new goals present an opportunity for advancing the women and children's agenda outlined in the Consensus Statement.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Gender-sensitive reporting in medical research
    (2012) Heidari, Shirin; Abdool Karim, Quarraisha; Auerbach, Judith D.; Buitendijk, Simone E.; Cahn, Pedro; Curno, Mirjam J.; Hankins, Catherine; Katabira, Elly; Kippax, Susan; Marlink, Richard; Marsh, Jennifer; Marusic, Ana; Nass, Heidi M.; Montaner, Julio; Pollitzer, Elizabeth; Ruiz-Cantero, Maria Teresa; Sherr, Lorraine; Papa Salif Sow; Squires, Kathleen; Wainberg, Mark A.
    Sex and gender differences influence the health and wellbeing of men and women. Although studies have drawn attention to observed differences between women and men across diseases, remarkably little research has been pursued to systematically investigate these underlying sex differences. Women continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials, and even in studies in which both men and women participate, systematic analysis of data to identify potential sex-based differences is lacking. Standards for reporting of clinical trials have been established to ensure provision of complete, transparent and critical information. An important step in addressing the gender imbalance would be inclusion of a gender perspective in the next Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guideline revision. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals, as a set of well-recognized and widely used guidelines for authors and biomedical journals, should similarly emphasize the ethical obligation of authors to present data analyzed by gender as a matter of routine. Journal editors are also promoters of ethical research and adequate standards of reporting, and requirements for inclusion of gender analyses should be integrated into editorial policies as a matter of urgency.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Should active recruitment of health workers from Sub-Saharan Africa be viewed as a crime?
    (2008) Mills, Edward J.; Schabas, William A.; Volmink, Jimmy; Walker, Roderick; Ford, Nathan; Katabira, Elly; Anema, Aranka; Joffres, Michel; Cahn, Pedro; Montaner, Julio
    Shortages of health-care staff are endemic in sub-Saharan Africa (table). 1 Overall, there is one physician for every 8000 people in the region. In the worst affected countries, such as Malawi, the physician-to-population ratio is just 0·02 for every 1000 (one per 50 000). There are also huge disparities between rural and urban areas: rural parts of South Africa have 14 times fewer doctors than the national average. 2 These numbers are very different to those in developed countries: the UK, for example, has over 100 times more physicians per population than Malawi. 3 Furthermore, almost one in ten doctors working in the UK are from Africa. The insufficiency of health staff to provide even basic services is one of the most pressing impediments to health-care delivery in resource-poor settings. The consequences are clearly shown by the inverse relation that exists between health-care worker density and mortality.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Time to act: global apathy towards HIV/AIDS is a crime against humanity
    (2002-11) Hogg, Robert; Cahn, Pedro; Katabira, Elly; Lange, Joep; Samuel, NM; O'Shaughnessy, Michael; Vella, Stefano; Wainberg, Mark; Montaner, Julio
    “There are some people who say that in Africa, people will not be able to take these drugs because they cannot tell time. I may not have a watch, but I can assure you that since I started taking my triple therapy in August last year, I haven't missed one dose.” Fred Minandi, a farmer from Malawi
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Universal access in the fight against HIV/AIDS
    (2010) Girard, Françoise; Ford, Nathan; Montaner, Julio; Cahn, Pedro; Katabira, Elly
    In 2006, all United Nations member states committed themselves to the goal of universal access to comprehensive programs for HIV prevention, treatment, care, and support by 2010 (1). This commitment has inspired national and international responses to achieve impressive results. Unfortunately, it is now clear that the global community has failed to deliver on the universal access pledge. Worse, the global AIDS response is currently under attack. What have we learned, and where should we go from here?